User talk:Fclass.html

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for ongoing disruptive edits. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Gwen Gale (talk) 18:20, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Unblock me, please."

Decline reason: "No rationale for unblocking specified. —Travis ^talk 17:39, 1 November 2008 (UTC)"

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read our guide to appealing blocks first and use the {{unblock}} template again. Abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

See User:Yurte. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:40, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Request reason: "I won't ask meaningless questions again."

Decline reason: "You were blocked several times before, including a couple of indefs, promised to be good, then continued being disruptive. Why should we believe you this time? MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 19:09, 1 November 2008 (UTC)"

Fclass, stay away (and I mean stay away) until 2009 and odds are, we'll unblock you (hint, hint, nod, nod, wink, wink). Gwen Gale (talk) 19:11, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Fclass is dead. Goodbye. Fclass (talk) 19:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

your question

In answer to this question, yes. Stay away from en.Wikipedia altogether (no sockpuppets) until 1 January 2009 and you will very likely be unblocked, although maybe with some small restrictions at first. You must show us you can sway your own behaviour and staying away for 2 months will go a very long way towards doing this. It's up to you, it truly is. Gwen Gale (talk) 16:33, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm still waiting for you to indefinitely block Mcelite. Fclass (talk) 00:39, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

No other editor has anything whatsoever to do with this. This is only about your behaviour whilst editing with Wikipedia user accounts. It's not even about you as a person. Gwen Gale (talk) 01:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

And actually it is a little bit about you as a person, or at least about your attitudes to what you should be allowed to do as a person. I offered you a pretty clear path to get back to editing, but I asked you to show some willingness to cooperate and progress. You chose instead to ignore most of what I asked for, and instead just keep posting unblock requests based on the same vague promises you'd made before. You also decided to evade your block by using sockpuppets. That doesn't make you a bad person, not by any means - it just indicates that you might not be a person well-suited to editing Wikipedia. We really value the idea of respecting the rules and other people, because that's what makes this a productive and enjoyable environment.

I don't blame you at all for not believing that I could get you unblocked if you would agree to (and follow) some conditions. I was willing to put my own name on the line to get you another chance. That chance is gone now, because you decided to follow your own path and started evading your block. You really should take Gwen's advice to sit out for a while, because you've burned all your other bridges. I've already told you that I'm available by email to discuss things - but there's really no point just posting unblock requests right at the moment. Franamax (talk) 02:14, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

We're still friends, right, Gwen Gale? Is that your real name? Fclass (talk) 16:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

I would honestly doubt it, seeing as every time we try to help you, you blow it back in our faces. Stop creating socks, you're only making things worse for yourself.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs /_Improve 05:20, 8 November 2008 (UTC)